Systems
Four systems, each solving a different half of the same problem.
The framework makes a model's output checkable. The platform makes agents that use it governable. The research platform is what you build once you have both. Every figure below was measured against the repository, not estimated.
01
Cortex
visit ↗A governed control plane for AI agents
A private control tower that lets a company run AI coding agents from chat apps like Slack or Telegram — with rules about who may do what, a full audit trail, and one-click deployment of whatever the agents build.
- 182,600 lines
- Source: git ls-files across .py/.ts/.tsx/.js/.mjs/.sh, excluding one vendored bundle directory
- 53
- Source: ls control/plane/src/server/services/
- 643
- Source: grep 'def test_' across tests/
- Two-plane authorisation: 15 control surfaces × 4 account groups × per-runtime capability policies, so a lower-privilege human can drive a higher-capability agent without escalation. Append-only audit log; TTL-scoped cross-organisation delegation.
- Gauntlet, a four-track agent-harness benchmark on UK AISI's Inspect AI composing eight public datasets, running safety probes inside a network-blocked sandbox against a fabricated decoy. Measures harness delta rather than absolute model score, because scaffold choice can move results further than the model does.
- Formal adversarial review of the agent wrapper with every finding closed and regression-tested: a normalised command classifier resistant to several evasion classes, a fail-closed policy bridge and approval gate, and an OS-level sandbox backstop.
- Production surface: Terraform-provisioned hosts, 13 Docker Compose stacks, 5 CI/CD pipelines including a fully automated provisioning lane with no operator and no agent in the loop, and OpenTelemetry tracing correlated browser-to-server.
- TypeScript
- Python
- React
- Node
- Docker
- Terraform
- OpenTelemetry
- Inspect AI
02
omegaXiv
Autonomous research platform
An online platform where AI agents actually run a scientific investigation end to end — planning it, executing code in isolated sandboxes, checking their own work against strict quality contracts, and publishing a finished, peer-reviewable paper.
- 613,600 lines
- Source: git ls-files across .py/.ts/.tsx
- 8,100 Python + 3,900 TS
- Source: grep 'def test_' and it(/test( across the tree; 80% coverage gate
- 9
- Source: docs/v3/ARCHITECTURE.md service table
- Designed the run engine: a deterministic render → turn → parse → validate → repair phase loop that binds every model output to a per-phase schema, classifies failures into a six-value verdict, and auto-repairs within bounded attempts before escalating to a human.
- Built spend governance into the run lifecycle — payment pre-authorisation before dispatch settled by capture-or-cancel through a single idempotent finaliser, plus a cross-replica model throttle and a token-budgeted context packager.
- Shipped an autonomous supervisor that detects interrupted runs, decides with an LLM, and applies a typed intervention or escalates — with row-level locking so a supervisor and a human cannot double-apply the same fix.
- Enforced architecture mechanically rather than by review: layer import direction checked in CI, consumer-driven contract tests that load the producer's real payload builder, and a harness that turns any skipped or empty test tier into a build failure.
- Python
- FastAPI
- Next.js
- PostgreSQL
- Redis
- Azure
- Terraform
- Pydantic
03
Open-source neuro-symbolic framework
An open-source framework that combines language models with mathematical solvers, so a complex task breaks into small steps that can each be checked for correctness instead of trusted.
- 1,745
- Source: GitHub API, 2026-08-04
- 91
- Source: GitHub API, 2026-08-04
- 49
- Source: Google Scholar, 2026-08-04
- Author and maintainer. Composes generative models with symbolic solvers over an expression graph, decomposing a complex task into small operations that are individually verifiable and recombinable.
- Published at CoLLAs 2024. Recognised publicly by Gary Marcus, Sepp Hochreiter, Jim Fan, an IBM Executive Architect and Microsoft's Data & AI Product Lead.
- Covered by MarkTechPost, Science Times, Montreal.AI and mind-verse.
- Python
- Z3
- SymPy
- WolframAlpha
- BSD-3-Clause
04
Story Editor
visit ↗Human-centric AI publishing
A writing tool built with the publishing platform story.one that guides an author from research to a finished book through six checked stages, instead of generating a draft and hoping.
- 18 months
- Source: The Inflection Point, ExtensityAI blog, Sep 2025
- Frankfurt Book Fair 2025
- Source: PR Newswire, Sep 2025
- Led the AI architecture productising the neuro-symbolic stack into a six-stage authoring workflow — search, read, summarise, write, improve, finalise — with structured outputs, cross-reference consistency checks and human-in-the-loop review.
- Defined abstract editorial concepts such as writing style and tonality in terms a machine could execute without conflicting instructions.
- Python
- SymbolicAI
- LLM orchestration